login   |    register
Revell of Germany [ MORE REVIEWS ] [ WEBSITE ] [ NEW STORIES ]

In-Box Review
Revell Leopard 1A5
Revell Leopard 1A5
  • move

by: Tom Cromwell [ BARKINGDIGGER ]

Originally published on:

I started writing this review over a year before MENG announced their new Leo 1A4 kit, so apologies if you were expecting something other than old-school plastic here! Still, the point of this review is to have something available online for those wanting to know about the Revell and Italeri Leopard 1 kits, as there is very little in the way of accessible detailed kit reviews of these 30 year old beasts. Hopefully it can serve as a baseline for the inevitable comparisons to the new MENG kit!

In 1965 the Bundeswehr introduced the world to the future of MBT design in the form of the Leopard. These first tanks featured a cast turtle-shaped turret and welded hull with sloping sides, eventually being branded “Leopard 1” after the massively improved Leopard 2 appeared a decade later. The Leopard 1 was built in several production batches that each incorporated minor changes, but the major variants are “1A1” (batches 1-4), “1A2” and “1A3” (batch 5, split by different turret designs), and “1A4” (batch 6). Of these, the 1A3 and 1A4 versions used a new welded boxy turret from Blohm and Voss, featuring composite armour.

Visible differences included a square infantry phone box on the rear hull (first batch only) later changed to a round one, hull-side exhaust covers with vertical dividing bars (first three batches) later changed to covers with uninterrupted slots on batches 4-6, and of course the welded turret of the A3 and A4. From batch 2 the hull got a splash ring around the turret base, and large lifting eyes were added to the front and rear from batch 3. Many of these detail improvements were important enough to be added as older tanks got overhauled, so the only dependable spotting features that survived the 1A5 upgrade to denote early batches are the infantry phone and exhaust covers.

When the BW decided to upgrade the cast-turret Leopards with added turret armour and a new camera-based targeting system they re-worked existing tanks from the 1A1 and 1A2 series, leading to subtle differences in non-critical details between the original batches. The 1A1 tanks became the 1A1A1, 1A1A2, 1A1A3 and 1A1A4 models, depending on radios and other internal items, but all of them featured the add-on armour and big PZB camera in its distinctive cage on the gun mantlet, opposite the searchlight box. At the same time as the 1A1A1 upgrade, some 1A1 tanks received a whole new EMES target sighting and laser ranging system to replace the TEM optical range finder (with its characteristic lenses in armoured blisters that resembled “frog eyes” either side of the turret) and became 1A5 models. The laser system was housed in a box on the turret roof, and this box (along with the lack of “frog eyes”, searchlight, and PZB camera tube) marks the visible difference between the 1A1A1-4 and 1A5 models. Some 1A3 tanks were similarly upgraded to the new EMES system.

Information gleaned mainly from the excellent Tankograd books 5013 & 5014, as well as the web.

Back in the late 1970s Italeri took the modelling world by storm with its stunning kit of the Leopard 1A4 (kit #224, also released by Testors in the United States as #805). It was beautifully detailed for the time, outshining the comparatively crude offerings from Tamiya. This was then followed up with several incarnations of the Leo 1 with cast turret, including a 1A2 (Italeri #374), 1A1A1-4 (Revell #03017, same as Italeri #374), and 1A5 (Italeri #6481 and Revell #03028) in conjunction with Revell. All of them use the hull and wheel sprues from the 1A4 kit, so they represent the later versions as regards tool placement etc.

This Leo 1A5 kit was reviewed here as well as by John Lavallee on the old ipmslondon.ca website (my link no longer works!) quite a long time ago, but there are no pictures so I thought it worth doing a new review for those who might be thinking of getting their hands on this kit. It may be out of production, but it turns up in shops, shows, and auction sites frequently, and of course Italeri is currently listing its own boxing (#6481) as available. As I also have the Italeri Leo 1A4 and Revell Leo 1A1A1-4 in the stash I shall be drawing comparisons along the way.

Inside Revell’s typical end-opening soft cardboard box I found an A4-size instruction booklet (with decal sheet tucked inside) and a single plastic bag containing all the kit sprues. While this keeps the kit together for packing and transport, it allows the parts to rub together – some of mine have whitish marks from this friction. The bag also has small air-holes, so loose tiny parts can still escape. By contrast, my Italeri kit has no bag at all.

There are four dark green sprues holding 386 parts, as well as a set of vinyl tracks and grousers on a sprue. Two of the sprues (A & B, the wheel and upper hull ones) come straight from the ancient 1A4, but are still decent even by today’s standards. The turret/lower hull sprue C comes from the 1A2 & 1A1A1-4 kits, while the turret armour sprue D is a modification of the same from the 1A1A1-4 kit, with the PZB camera parts deleted and the laser sight parts added. Interestingly, both sets of parts are shown on the sprue in Italeri’s boxing of the 1A5 (#6481), suggesting that Revell have simply closed off the gates to different areas of the mould depending on the intended kit.

I found no significant sink-holes (an Italeri specialty!) in my sample, apart from a few on the suspension arms that should be hidden when built.

Starting with the basics, the overall dimensions all seem to fall within a millimetre of the drawings in the Tankograd books, even allowing for my “ruler & Mk 1 Eyeball” technology! Detail on the parts is good, although in some cases edges are a little “soft”, but today we might expect the tools moulded separately to their brackets, rather than as a single part. Another thing that shows the age of the tooling is the use of “outlines” for parts placement, moulded onto the upper hull. These can be filled (they are depressions), but will be hidden anyway if you add all the gear. Stowage for these tanks was pretty standard in the photos I’ve seen, so there is little need to move things and expose the outlines. Bear in mind the stowage layout is only appropriate to later Leos, coming as it does from the 1A4 kit – if you want to back-date any of the Leo 1 kits to the initial batch prior to upgrades you’d need to look at references because some of the tools were in different places on the early ones.

A very nice touch is the presence of decent weld seams. Way back in the 1970s it seems Italeri predicted the main gripe of modellers in the second decade of the new millennium! Not only do we have welds along panel lines – we even get them around the mounting points for items like the lift rings.

The 1A4 kit came with the later side exhaust grilles without vertical dividers, and these are still included. There are also new “early” grilles with the dividers and the raised rear section to represent an early-batch hull. Some of the marking schemes call for one or other of these options, which are shown on the painting guide, so it’s best to choose before building. Note also that the turret sprue includes the early square infantry telephone box for the rear hull, as fitted to the first batch tanks – these could survive on upgraded vehicles so having the option is a nice touch. Sadly, neither phone box is designed to be shown open.

One of the rare faults in the old 1A4 hull is the air intake grille on the rear deck. Italeri gives a simple piece of mesh to fill the hole, but the real one had an underlying metal frame and a square central attachment point for the lifting apparatus needed to remove the whole deck for engine replacement. (Tamiya got this right on their 1A4…) A replacement for the air intake grille is available from Perfect-Scale that provides both the central lifting attachment and the underlying framework, and a whole etch set including the grille is available from Eduard.

Suspension & tracks
Unlike Tamiya, Italeri managed to get the road wheel diameter right. But even so, one of the real accuracy issues has always been the wheels – Italeri cut the tooling with odd little grooves spaced around the “rubber” treads. My guess is they saw lines on photos where the gaps between track pads left a line of dust across the wheel, and misinterpreted them as actual grooves rather than dust-stains, but either way they ought to go. There are replacement resin wheels available, or you can just fill the grooves with putty or strip plastic and sand smooth. Note that the bolt heads around the wheel faces are a tad small and anaemic compared to photos – if this bothers you then replacements will be needed. The suspension represents the improved type with armoured covers for the struts, added at the factory after the first batches and upgraded on early tanks as and when they got shop-time. Because the arms pass through to lock into an inner rib inside the hull they could (in theory!) act like short torsion bars if you don’t glue them at the point where they exit the hull, but I wouldn’t test it too hard. Detail on the parts is good.

The tracks represent Diehl D 640 type with replaceable rubber pads as fitted to later tanks (they come from the 1A4 kit), but most older tanks got these as & when the original non-replaceable rubber-chevron tracks wore out. (For the earlier track you need the Tamiya Leo 1 kit, but that’s about the only good part of it…) From past experience with the old Italeri 1A4 kit I know the suspension arms are fragile and the tracks are stiff enough to break axles. The Revell tracks are softer than the Italeri ones, but they will still pull hard on the idler mountings. Since the real tracks have no sag there really isn’t much “give” to compensate for the stiffness, and the biggest danger comes when fitting the tracks. To get round this you could drill out the idler arm and fit brass rod, but first I’d try to “train” the tracks into curves by dipping in hot water while bent, or with a hair dryer. Either way, cool them down afterwards with cold water to “set” the curve. (I’ve been known to make wooden forms for the tracks, so I can then heat them without having to hold them – I hate boiling my hands!) Fitting by stretching over the idler and sprocket is a non-starter. It’s better to add the inner half of the idler wheel, then the track, followed by the outer idler half so nothing needs to stretch. And since this all happens behind side skirts, it pays to assemble and paint the lower hull and suspension, before masking it off to paint the upper hull after the skirts are added. Bear in mind the tracks are old enough not to have decent end-connector detail, so it might be worth replacing them with plastic indy-link tracks from Peddinghaus.

The 1A5 comes with the early cast-steel turret, unlike the 1A4 that had a slab-sided design made of composite armour. Apparently the Italeri turret shape is not accurate around the front. Much has been made of this (see here and here for illustrated discussion), but frankly I can live with it. The real issue, when comparing it to the Tankograd drawings and real photos, is that it seems too “square-shouldered” around the frog-eyes, where the real thing had much more of an inward curve towards the roof that meant the range-finder blisters really stood out as tubes from the turret sides. Corrective surgery in the form of filing/sanding could sort this if needed.

Of greater concern is the lack of mounting points for the add-on armour. These can be made up from a bit of rod (or even sprue), but it is an annoying omission. The Peddinhaus replacement resin turret at least had these moulded on, but I’m not sure if it is still in production.

Hatches can be positioned open or closed, although there is nothing to fill the interior. And the main gun barrel is the usual two halves, so seem clean-up is required. As with so many kits of the post-dustcover period, the main gun elevation is fixed by the solid plastic “canvas”, something I have come to resent. Periscopes are all moulded-on lumps, and purists would argue that the rings around the hatches are too thick and should be replaced with photo-etch. There is a decent bustle rack that will try the patience of folk with less than three hands, and an “adequate” set of smoke launchers for the turret sides. For those all-important exercises this kit includes the barrel-mounted tubes for simulated main-gun action. The add-on armour has nice texturing. Since the 1A5 used a laser rangefinder there are blanking plates for the “frog-eyes” (although the rangefinders are still in the box) and a separate roof-mounted box with open doors for the new laser gubbins. Oh, and there’s a rotary beacon on a stick just begging to get broken off the turret roof! Pity the gum-ball is solid green instead of clear orange plastic…

Finally, there is the matter of a smooth surface. I know that Leopards don’t have much roughness to the turret castings, but this part is far too smooth when compared to the “tooth” Italeri added on the rolled-steel hull surfaces. Stippled glue or Mr Surfacer is your friend here.

There’s a Tank Commander included, but perhaps the less said, the better! (He’s not bad by Italeri standards, but still not quite “right”…)

A small sheet has markings for four tanks, three in Nato 3-tone camo and one in solid green. Markings are for:

2. Kompanie / PzBtl. 14, Hildesheim, 1990
Italian contingent, IFOR, Sarajevo, 1996
3. Kompanie / Pz AufklBtl. 1, Braunschweig, 1993
5. Kompanie / PzBtl. 413, Eggesin, 1992

Despite its age, the old Italeri Leopard is still a decent kit – way beyond the standards of its time. Revell’s version cashes in on that value, and despite a few issues it can be built up to a very good standard. As I type this MENG have announced a new kit of the Leo 1A4 that will presumably be state-of-the-art, but that doesn’t mean these old warriors are any less worthy of attention.
Highs: Sharp detail for an old kit! Weld seams, accurate dimensions, and a number of options.
Lows: “Groovy” wheels, a fixed barrel height, incorrect intake grille.
Verdict: Still worth buying and building if you like Cold War MBTs or Bundeswehr armour!
Percentage Rating
  Scale: 1:35
  Mfg. ID: 03028
  Related Link: 
  PUBLISHED: Oct 12, 2013

About Tom Cromwell (barkingdigger)

A Yank living overseas on a long-term basis, I've been building tanks since the early '70s. I relish the challenges of older kits (remember when Tamiya was "new"?...) because I love to scratch-build.

Copyright ©2021 text by Tom Cromwell [ BARKINGDIGGER ]. Images also by copyright holder unless otherwise noted. Opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of ModelGeek. All rights reserved.


With the different turrets and upgrade kits from PSM one can make a very nice "up to date" model. For PSMs Canadian stuff this kit still would probably be a cheaper and more reasonable alterative over the MENG kit. Cheers christopher
OCT 12, 2013 - 06:55 PM
Dear Tom, First of all, Thanks! for the detailed review. The point is, however, that one has to search for these models quite some time, since it is no longer available via the official Revell trade ways. Their website, LINK only shows the 2A4, 2A4NL, 2A6 and 2A6M. As stated before in another discussion about the Revell Dingo and MAN trucks, this habit is, in my humble opinion, the reason that this superb tank does not get the attention in the modeling world it deserves. Next to the fact that only a very small range of upgrade sets are available. So, if one wants to make a super detailled, correct version, quite some money and time is required........................
OCT 12, 2013 - 07:11 PM
Hi Chris, Indeed, there's life in the old kit yet! But I wait with bated breath for the first reviews of the new MENG kit... Paul, I agree, finding Revell/Italeri Leos can be a challenge. They seem to do a fresh run every once in a while, before letting supplies dry up again. I tend to pick mine up whenevber I see them going cheap at swap meets, model shows, and auction sites so I haven't been too affected by availability in the shops. The lack of AM goodies doesn't bother me too much, although I do need to stock up on engine grilles. Now all I need is enough time to build my stash!
OCT 13, 2013 - 12:36 AM

What's Your Opinion?

Click image to enlarge
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move